It's
funny how things work out. In 1922, visionary German director
F.W. Murnau made the first great vampire movie in Nosferatu,
but ran foul of Bram Stoker's estate when it brought a successful law suit for copyright infringement against the filmmakers, who had 'freely adapted' Stoker's seminal Dracula without consent from author
or publisher. With the production company now in liquidation, the
judge made the unusual decision to order all copies
of the film destroyed, leaving the way clear for Universal
Studios in the US to make the vampire movie that was to
define the genre for decades to come. So it seems only right
that five years later Murnau should be invited to Hollywood
by William Fox to make Sunrise: A Song of Two Humans
and that it should go on to win three Oscars at the first
ever Academy Awards ceremony in 1929. That he should do
so, that he was able to do so, without compromising his
style and vision is perhaps a testament to times past.
If anything, Murnau appears to have thrived in the Hollywood
of the day (a golden moment for the director there that
was sadly not to last), and with Sunrise
made one of the most emotionally overpowering, visually
striking and beautifully realised works not just of his
career, but of the whole silent era.
If
you don't want to know the film's story in detail, you might
want to skip the rest of this paragraph and the first part
of the next one. But if you're game then bear with me, as
there is reasoning behind my apparent plot spoiling. It goes like this.
An unnamed man lives on a farm with his wife and young child.
Once upon a time, the man and woman were very much in love with
each other and with life, but more recently things between them have
turned sour. The man has become involved with a Woman From
the City, who wants him to sell the farm and come live with her. In order free himself from his family, she suggests
that he kill his wife by pushing her into the nearby lake and passing it
off as a boating accident. Initially horrified at this suggestion,
the man's lust for the woman eventually pushes him to attempt
the darstardly deed, but at the last minute his wife's pleading awakens him to the terrible mistake he is about to make. He frantically
rows the boat to the far shore, where his wife runs away
and boards a tram to the city, anxiously pursued by her
desperately apologetic husband. As he tries to make amends,
the two of them observe a young couple entering a church
to marry, prompting the them to recall their own once strong
feelings for each other, and they emerge from the church ready to rediscover
their love for one another.
All
of which probably sounds like solid but largely familiar stuff, a melodrama of love tested by adversity in which everything works out well in
the end. There is even triumphant, climactic church-bell
driven music as they walk down the steps like besotted
newlyweds, announcing to the audience that everything has
worked out after all. But before those of you who chose
to ignore my warning complain that I've given away the whole
story, you should know that when the couple emerge from the
church we are not at the film's end, but only a little over
a third of the way in. Astonishingly, much of what
follows is devoted to the couple's rediscovery of their
love for each other, a complete reversal of the
usual narrative structure in which characters are introduced
and relationships defined and then subjected to narrative disruption.
Here the storyline is laid out first and then takes a back seat to
character development, only re-emerging later to provide a climactic scene that ties up loose ends and
gives the film a solid dramatic finale, one that is packed to
the brim with thematic and even ironic connections to earlier
story details.
If
this challenge to conventional narrative structuring makes
Sunrise seem as fresh today as it ever
did, then you ain't seen nothing yet. Few films in the history
of cinema, silent or otherwise, have achieved such an extraordinary
level of visual and dramatic poetry, or demonstrated so
vividly the possibilities of cinema as a means of emotional
and artistic expression. This is evident right from from the opening scene, as
a drawing dissolves to a wide shot of a city railway station
(actually a mixture of models, real people, forced perspective
sets, and paintings), which gives way to two dynamic superimpositions
that in a matter of seconds suggest the pace, industrialisation
and even glamour of (then) modern city life. In a time of
MTV visuals and post-production manipulation possibilities,
it is genuinely thrilling to look back almost eighty years
and see what might now be passed off as visual trickery
used with such an extraordinary sense of purpose. This is
rarely better demonstrated that in the scene in which multiple
images of the Woman From the City are superimposed over
the man she has an emotional hold over, all the more remarkable
for being created in camera (this
technology required to create this is post-production had not yet been developed).
Murnau
throughout tells the story in almost exclusively visual
terms, his use of complex tracking shots, carefully chosen
camera angles, expressionist sets and lighting, and even
performance providing us not just with detailed plot and
character information, but the emotional states, thoughts
and intentions of the two protagonists. Occasional intra-titles
provide clarity on dialogue, though even these have sometimes
expressionist overtones, with the line, "Couldn't she get…drowned?"
crumbling away as if into the water that the film then cuts to for
a flash-forward to the dark deed under discussion.
If
anything, the passing of time and an increasingly formulaic
approach to scene coverage and editing have enhanced the
boldness of Sunrise's technical handling.
Shots are held for sometimes mesmerising length (the tram
trip to the city focusses on the actors but has insanely complex
background detail, all constructed manually
on the Fox backlot), while others, notably the vision of
urban hgh-life conjured by the Woman from the City, have
a visual dynamism and energy that recalls the frantic imagery
of Vertov's Man With a Movie Camera. Every
shot is composed to perfection, the framing, lighting and
superimposition work of Charles Rosher and Karl Struss as
layered with meaning and subtext as they are visually striking,
especially when juxtaposed through Murnau's effective use
of cross-cutting, flashback and dark visions of possible
future events. Even the performances have expressionist
overtones, most notably in the Man's murderous approach
to his wife, in which his posture and movements most vividly
recall Paul Wegener's Golem, a hulking
stone figure driven to murderous intent by love.
Technical
dazzle aside, Sunrise delivers most effectively
as an emotional entertainment, engaging us with the plight,
torment and ultimately joy of its central characters in
a way that really fires up what would nowadays certainly
be passed off dismissively as a Hollywood ending. The sinister
gloom of the first third gives way to a charged exuberance,
reflecting the return of energy and love to the central relationship.
It's also peppered with comical set-pieces, sometimes involving
secondary characters: the frantic search for the
head of a knocked-off small statue that was headless in its original form; the camp prissiness of the barber; the fairground
games that result in the chasing of a drunken pig and its celebrated recapture;
the falling shoulder strap that is repeatedly returned to
its correct position (a gag taken here to its on-screen
limit and an inevitable punch-line). In essence, this midsection
becomes a celebration not just of love but of life itself.
That the reconciliation takes place in the very location
that spawned the initial temptation is one of many examples
of the multiple levels on which so much of the film works.
Sunrise
really is magnificent cinema, a gorgeous creation that is as startling
and original now as it ever was, in part because of the
arrival of synchronised sound and the end of an era in which
stories were told in such visual terms. That we still have
such a film to remind us how far the early pioneers took
a medium whose evolution appears to be slowing to a crawl
is to be enthusiastically celebrated.
OK,
the film was released in 1927, and yes there are dusts spots
and scratches and occasionally some more serious damage
and the image flickers throughout, but in all other respects
this is a terrific transfer, with the contrast, black levels
and (given the age) detail all superb, and damage when it does
appear has been cleaned up so effectively that you only really notice
it on areas of one shade. The picture framed at its original
aspect ratio of 1.20:1, which will display small black bars
on the sides on a 4:3 TV.
There
are two music tracks on offer, the original mono Movietone
score and a newer stereo score by Timothy Brock and performed
by the Olympic Chamber Orchestra. Brock's score wisely takes
many of its cues from the Movietone score and works well
for the film, but I have to express a preference for the
original – the sinister rhythmic notes in the first third,
the slightly less obvious use of sound effects when the
couple cause a traffic jam with a passionate kiss, even
the use of silence over the opening titles. Both sound good,
and considering its age, the original score is in very impressive
shape.
This,
it should be noted, is a re-issue of Eureka's first Masters
of Cinema title, a two-disc release that has been repackaged
on a single DVD, in the process losing a couple of its original
extra features.
There
is a commentary by cinematographer
John Bailey, who has shot sixty films, including American
Gigolo, Cat People and Mishima:
A Life in Four Chapters for Paul Schrader, as well
as such notables as Silverado, A
Brief History of Time and Groundhog Day.
Given the sizeable amount that has already been written
about the film's meanings and layering and stylistics, it
is refreshing that Bailey focuses primarily on the cinematography,
his own area of specialisation and one of the film's Academy
Award-winning components. It's a consistently fascinating listen,
revealing a great deal about the complex construction of
images within the film, including sets that I was certain
had to be locations and the use of forced perspective and
midgets to create a false but convincing sense of scale.
The
trailer (1:50) is in surprisingly
good shape and is made up of brief shots from the film intercut
with positive press quotes. There is no music score on this.
A
selection of outtakes (9:15) can
be viewed either with intra-titles outlining the sequence
to follow or with a John Bailey commentary. Bailey makes
several references to the outtakes in the main commentary
and this is effectively an extension of that. Frankly, I
was surprised these even existed, and they're not in that
bad shape considering their age and the unlikelihood of
their survival. As you'd expect, they are a valuable inclusion.
Murnau's
4 Devils: Traces of a Lost Film (39:59) attempts
to reconstruct Murnau's lost 1928 film 4 Devils
through the use of posters, programmes, production sketches,
script extracts, blueprints of sets and publicity stills,
all rather dryly voiced over. It does rather make you hungry
for the film itself.
There
are also a three DVD-ROM features in the shape of the Screenplays
for both Sunrise and 4 Devils
in Microsoft Word format, and the Original Photoplay
Script, complete with hand-written annotations,
in PDF format. I particularly applaud this, as this enables
you to scale the text to your preferred size, and is thus
accessible to the visually impaired.
Finally
there is the expected 40-page Booklet which
is of the usual excellent Eureka standard, and includes
detailed notes of the restoration of the film by David Pierce,
comprehensive essays on the film by R. Dixon Smith (2004),
Lotte H. Eisner (1964), Robin Wood (1998) and Lucy Fischer
(1998). All make for fascinating reading.
The
term classic is thrown about with such abandon these days
that it's lost all meaning, usually applied to films just
a few years old that have yet to stand the test of time
or be widely appraised and evaluated – the term 'instant
classic' in particular is an oxymoronic one. Sunrise:
A Song of Two Humans is genuine classic cinema
in every sense of the word, a towering work that has proved
enormously influential, been extensively and intricately
written about and, most importantly, has stood the test
of time magnificently.
Eureka's
re-release showcases the film wonderfully, with a terrific
transfer, two soundtrack options, a fine technical commentary
and some very nice extras. This one deserves a place on
the shelf of everyone who truly loves cinema.
|